iantenna wrote:
look, all i know is that regardless of how your stupid ass mick jagger budget is laid out if you can't offer a dude a fucking bone for some actual important research and you are HBO who is allegedly good at making tv shows you are doing it wrong. god forbid mick and marty and whoever else at the top get their dick sucked one less time per month to free up some cash flow.
at my old job we sold like 2k CDs of the most unsellable bullshit at a dollar a pop to some drew barrymore / apple ad guy movie for backdrop in like one scene. you can find $500 dollars pretty much fucking anywhere in a budget this size. take it out of the fake coke budget.
Sorry, I can't think of a single reason why they should pay for these images at all. They would just use them to get real examples of how people looked/dressed back then. Believe it or not, the internet probably has literally millions of images that would serve the same purpose for free. She was nice enough to ask permission to download the images when she could have just done it anyway.
No offense to breakmyface, but I would have been pretty surprised if they had come across with money for this.
Really, this is some pretty pointless outrage. There's a gigantic difference between paying for something that is actually used in a shot and something that an assistant looks at on their computer to (maybe) get ideas. I'm sure they look at hundreds, if not thousands of images in the process, but yeah, drop $500 a pop, no prob. If you think modern productions like this still have significant coke/hooker budgets, you are stuck in a major time warp.
